Friday morning I went to Kulturmagasinet by bicycle, because I had a role in Sorana's movie. My designation was "Fan #2" and I had to get a signature in my favorite book from my favorite author while he was presenting them in the library. But first, I had to stand in a queue. But in contrast to Mathieu's movie two weeks ago, I had to look excited. It was interesting to see how the film crew worked. Their effort seemed to be pretty efficient and professional. I do not know how many times the shot Fan #1 (Raya) and Fan #2 from how many angles. Even if they will have determined which compilation of shots they will use in the end, I can hardly imagine they will keep the whole storyline of waiting queue, Fan #1 and Fan #2. At the movie I witnessed last year they just took three shots always from the same angle. And the shots this year were much shorter. I am looking forward to see it. Could be a lively movie (although it is a thriller). Another difference to the movies of last year are the topics. Last year almost none of the movies had a serious topic. Most of them were about student life and were meant as comedy. The deepest similarity between this year and last year are the stylistic devices. I believe, without sufficient equipment and professional actors confusion is the most important device for evolving tension in a movie. The this years confusions promise to be interesting. Every topic I heard of was dramatic. I am looking forward to see the results.
After the movie session I went to shopping to Lidl buying some stuff for the evening, because we made a barbeque in the wood for Jonny's birthday. It was very nice, but in the rain my cold got worse so I went back home after 2 hours and did not even attend the suprise party for Jonny. I believe, he had fun anyway :)
My article stucks. The books I have interest me, but I fear I missed the topic. Tomorrow is the deadline and I should somehow combine the facts I mentioned to a knot again. I started in the beginning with a suggestion, worked out a solution and now I should recombine problem and suggestion to a conclusion, but I do not know how. I hope, I will find an idea today.
My article stucks. The books I have interest me, but I fear I missed the topic. Tomorrow is the deadline and I should somehow combine the facts I mentioned to a knot again. I started in the beginning with a suggestion, worked out a solution and now I should recombine problem and suggestion to a conclusion, but I do not know how. I hope, I will find an idea today.
Comments